Category Archives: Female Artists

#FringeFemmes 2026: Meet Kathy Westfield

By Constance Jaquay Strickland

Conversations with some of #HFF26’s compelling “Women on the Fringe”

Ten years ago, I did my first Fringe Femme interview out of a desperate need to hear and uplift the voices of women of color during Fringe. I also selfishly wanted to bear witness and, in some small way, archive the multiplicity of voices and conversations women of color were having.

The reality was, I was having a hard time discovering and seeing the work of women of color. I knew I had a small network, no connections, and yet I still found a way. I knew that the hardest part of manifesting a new work was finding a way to let people know you have a show happening.

The 2026 Hollywood Fringe Femme Interview series is an ode to the women who find a way to tell stories by any means necessary. And this Fringe Femme is truly a miracle – I do not say that frivolously. In the United States, nearly 1 in 3 women have experienced a form of physical violence by an intimate partner. Nearly 75% of all domestic homicide and severe violent crime victims of domestic abuse are women.

Currently here in California, the Hope Transitional Shelter houses more than three dozen women and children who are facing a high risk of losing services that support families experiencing domestic violence. As a child who witnessed my mother escape domestic violence, I know how urgent and vital services are for families to get back on their feet but also how it transforms an entire family when women have the ability, support and forums to share their stories of survival.

This is why it is not only emotional, but truly a blessing to introduce Fringe Femme Kathy Westfield and “He Put His Hands On Me.” May each time she shares her story, it saves another woman’s life. May each time she shares her story, it transforms the lens via how women are viewed. May each time she shares her story, it opens a portal of courage and healing for all the women who are on the brink of leaving a violent partner.

Kathy Westfield

Constance Jaquay Strickland: How long have you been sitting with this work and what led you to the Hollywood Fringe?

Kathy Westfield: I initially wrote “He Put His Hands On Me” in 2018. In searching for a platform for my show, I came across the Hollywood Fringe Festival. It immediately caught my attention because it provided an opportunity without creative limits, was part of the performing arts community and it also gave me the freedom to produce my own show. So, in October 2019 and then in January 2020, I produced my show in preparation for the June 2020 Hollywood Fringe Festival.  However, in February 2020, COVID hit. [And the 2020 Hollywood Fringe was cancelled.]

Constance: So why now?

Kathy: Because it was time to just do it! I could not forget how the audience at my last show came onstage, surrounded me and asked, “When is your next show?” They maintained a strong position stating, “You have to do it again. People need to hear your story.”

Constance: Were there joy and surprises that you discovered when creating your show?

Kathy: There was joy in realizing my show could possibly help someone who is currently being abused.  It then was no longer just about writing my story.  It now had a much bigger purpose. True joy came in knowing that I am fortunate to be alive.  I can now share my journey to enlighten, inform and to encourage others.

Constance: What was your biggest challenge in terms of the Fringe and your development process?

Kathy: As the artist as well as the producer, it was challenging handling all the duties, i.e., securing the venue, production and promotions, as well as other performance related duties. I stayed busy from the inception, through the rewrites and all the way through managing the tech rehearsals. One had to be organized in order to be successful.

Constance: What did you enjoy most about doing your show during the Fringe?

Kathy: I enjoyed being able to touch the hearts of the audience by using my sense of humor in an effort to lighten up some of the pretty dark times in my story. There were tears by those embracing my pain as well as tears of joy brought forth through my humor. The audience didn’t leave the show depressed and sad, but rather empowered and uplifted.

Constance: So is the show a love letter to survivors or a plea to the community and women still stuck in violent relationships?

Kathy: My show is to all of the above. For survivors, it’s a reminder about just how far they have come. It’s also an opportunity for the community to better understand the challenges facing most victims. And it is definitely an opportunity to provide information to victims presently in a violent relationship so they know help is available 24 hours a day at (800)799-7233(SAFE). 

Kathy Westfield in “He Put His Hands On Me”

Constance: Do you believe theatre is a bridge to healing and rebuilding?

Kathy: I most definitely believe theatre is a bridge to both healing and rebuilding. Experiencing the performance of someone who has overcome a hurdle can give another individual the hope and insight needed in overcoming their similar situation. It can also become a shared emotional journey for the audience as well as a pathway towards healing for the performer.

In fact, acting out my domestic violence experiences in my performances has allowed me the opportunity to process the pain, verbalize my emotions and release the shame many times felt by both victims and survivors.  It has helped me tremendously in my healing process.

 Constance: Silence often plays a huge part in how domestic violence continues. To stay silent is to hide the shame that may exist; it may also cost a woman her life. How did you navigate this when choosing to put your story onstage?

Kathy: Balancing the discovery of my voice and saving my own life had to be approached carefully. I had to come to the realization if I remained silent I could potentially die. Secondly, I had to make the decision not to embrace the shame because shame keeps us shackled.

In my first abusive relationship, I carefully planned an escape. I say carefully because this is the most dangerous time for a victim.  Statistics show 75% of deaths occur when the victim tries to leave their abuser.

Lastly, I learned to listen to my inner voice. One night during my abusive marriage my husband knocked me to the floor and started choking me. I couldn’t breathe but then I heard a voice say, “Bite him.” When I bit him, he released my neck. I then escaped by running down our apartment hallway screaming for help and a complete stranger opened her door, pulled me inside and then slammed the door behind me. I learned not to ignore that inner voice. It’s there for a reason.

Constance: Are you planning to continue performing “He Put His Hands On Me?” How do you see it living beyond Fringe?

Kathy: I definitely believe there is a need to continue. Audience members’ responses and reviews demonstrate it  has a purpose. With all the feedback I have received, I envision the show has the potential to be successfully produced at theatrical venues as well as through women’s organizations, churches, advocacy groups and universities for fundraisers, community awareness and educational purposes.

Constance: I love the double-entendre title of your solo show. It is very powerful. May I ask you to describe how your faith saw you through this painful season?

 Kathy: My faith evolved while I was deep into my abusive marriage. I was at my wit’s end. I finally got on my knees one night and turned my life over to God. I then began building a closer  relationship with Him. As I grew in my spiritual walk, so did my faith. On more than one occasion strangers were placed in my path and saved me from harm’s way. I do not believe their placement was coincidental but rather it was God’s divine intervention. Without faith, I’m convinced I would not be alive today. Men put their hands on me but God had his hands on me all along.

Constance: How are you doing now? How are you allowing love and laughter to stay active and alive?

Kathy: Currently, I continue to perform my clean, stand-up comedy. I share love through my humor in an effort to bring joy to my audiences. I am a firm believer that it may not be funny at the time, but eventually, we can find humor in just about any situation. Laughter has been a major source of my healing.

I am also actively researching plans to take my solo show on the road!

For info on “He Put His Hands On Me” at the 2026 Hollywood Fringe, visit https://www.hollywoodfringe.org/projects/13495

Go Here for More About Kathy Westfield

The FPI Files: SheLA Arts is Back With Stories to Tell

The SheLA Arts Summer Theater Festival is back in Los Angeles, this year at Rogue Machine Theatre. The 2026 Festival features four plays and one musical, and we’re glad to be able to profile the femme writers again, getting to know them and these new works a bit better through a few questions.


Ashley Denise Robinson

Ashley Denise Robinson – Writer/director of “The Partner Or, The Sou-Sou Play”

The Play: Every Tuesday night, five first-generation women meet to exchange money, gossip, and insults. Their deepest secrets are pulled out of the shadows when a new, non- Caribbean member joins the group. “The Partner, or The Sou-Sou Play” pulls at the threads of how tightly we can hold on to our secret lives, no matter the cost.

LAFPI: Where did this play come from and why were you compelled to write it?

Ashley Denise Robinson: It was important for me to write the sou-sou play because I wanted to see more first generation, Caribbean and African women on stage. Sou-sou was something that I had just recently learned about and I wanted people to understand this very old very traditional form of money saving that came out of West Africa. I also wanted to send a play around a topic that I personally hadn’t seen before. I think writing the sou-sou play has reinforced the power of women, specifically Black women, and the power of community and also how trying to smooth over the circle can cause fractures that may never be able to be mended. 

LAFPI: What do you hope is next for your play?

Ashley: Global dominance. Because sou-sou is a global practice, I’d love to see the show in different countries, different languages, with different people taking on these characters. I’d also love for audience members to see these women and themselves, and to have something to relate to in terms of first generation stories, complicated, love stories, black women stories. 

LAFPI: What should someone ask you about your work?

Ashley: “How many commissions can you take on this year?” “Are you available to be out of the country writing for the next 6 months?” “Where can we house you in NYC/London for the Broadway run and West End runs?” 

Ashley Denise Robinson, Catie Zaleski and Heather Daughtry in rehearsal for “The Partner Or, The Sou-Sou Play”

“The Partner Or, The Sou-Sou Play,” written and directed by Ashley Denise Robinson, plays July 7 & 9 at 7:30pm


Chandler Patton

Chandler Patton – Book writer of “Ghostlight,” a new musical

The Play: Leah just can’t catch a break. After bombing her audition for the revival of her dream show — “Ghostlight”, the story of 19th-century Pre-Raphaelite poet-painters Dante Gabriel Rossetti and Elizabeth Siddal — she and her best friend Jen are about to give up on their dreams. Then they get the call. As they rehearse, argue, and create, the line between reality and theatricality blurs, forcing them to face the truths about their characters, themselves…and the pasts that haunt them still. This is a real play about a fake musical.

LAFPI: What made it important for you to write this play?

Chandler Patton: I wanted to explore the addictive, electric energy of collaboration–to capture, in real time, that magic that all theatre artists pursue. It’s a story about how artists turn their pain into beauty, and to me, the tragic story of Elizabeth Siddal is the perfect example of this. 

LAFPI: Which playwrights do you find most inspiring?

Chandler: I’m a dramaturg, so too many to name. This play in particular was heavily inspired by Venus in Fur by David Ives. Unfortunately a lot of the best plays I’ve ever read have been unproduced and by struggling writers… but I’m very inspired by that. Here’s to all the epic plays gathering dust in desk drawers as we speak.

LAFPI: What do you wish someone would ask you about your work?

Chandler: I’d secretly love to be asked about the uncanny woo-woo experiences I had writing the play…about how I would create specific details in the story that I thought I was inventing, only to come across them deep in the historical record and find out that I was correct.

Rehearsing “Ghostlight”

“Ghostlight,” book by Chandler Patton, music & lyrics by Steven James Schmidt and directed by Andrew Ceglio, plays July 8 at 7:30pm, July 11 at 8:30pm


Bridget Flanery

Bridget Flanery – Writer/director of “Litter”

The Play: A backpack is surreptitiously thrown out of an Uber on a Des Moines highway. When the bag’s gruesome contents are discovered, Detectives Merritt and Van Roekel track down and interrogate the 15 year-old passenger responsible for the “littering”.

LAFPI: Why did you want to write this play?

Bridget Flanery: I hadn’t seen these people or these circumstances before on stage or film and that drove my writing process.  I tried to explore the humanity of their struggles and their aches and give reason or make sense of what might seem controversial behavior and action.  

LAFPI: Do you see a lot of plays?

Bridget: I attend a great deal of Theatre and I read a lot of plays.  I will always feel like there is something sacred about sitting in a live audience in that darkened space, experiencing the art form where anything can happen.

LAFPI: Are there playwrights who inspire you?

Bridget: Oh, gosh, there are SO many.  Anton Chekhov, Lillian Hellman, Tennessee Williams, Edward Albee, August Wilson, Lynn Nottage, Lauren Gunderson, Sarah Ruhl,  Duncan MacMillan… I could go on forever.

Olivia Garrity in rehearsal for “Litter”

“Litter,” written and directed by Bridget Flanery, plays July 10 at 7:30pm and July 11 at 12:00pm


Caroline Ullman

Caroline Ullman – Writer/director of “Role Models”

The Play: Jack and his older sister Willa haven’t spoken in months, since she moved to New York without him. When he finally agrees to pay Willa a visit and see her new life, he discovers that Willa’s new boyfriend Peter is someone he already knows and he must decide whether or not to tell Willa his secret and risk ruining the trip, and possibly their relationship as well.

LAFPI: What made you want to write this play?

Caroine Ullman: My favorite plays to write center on young people navigating messy relationships. I love coming of age stories about people making mistakes and learning from them (or not!) and ultimately seeing how the relationships evolve and change over time. This was my initial approach to writing “Role Models,” and the characters and plots began to flow.

LAFPI: And how has it been, taking the next steps into production?

Caroline: Having the opportunity to premiere my work with the team at SheLA is always a dream! I feel so lucky to spend time with such a collaborative, supportive group of artists. I’m excited to see this play on its feet for the first time, and how it will continue to grow and evolve from there.

LAFPI: As a writer, are there playwrights who have influenced you?

Caroline: One playwright I’ve always admired is Annie Baker. Reading her work growing up was definitely foundational to my own writing. I love losing myself in her characters’ dialogue and the complex relationships she crafts.

The Cast of “Role Models”

“Role Models,” written and directed by Caroline Ullman, plays July 11 at 2:30pm and July 11 at 4:00pm


Jenn Melyan

Jenn Melyan – Writer of “Her Way (隨 她而流)

The Play: Summoned home to her mother’s apartment in Kaoshiung, Jessica walks into an ambush: her mother, Anita, has stage 4 cancer, and a deadline. Anita wants to die with dignity by week’s end, and she wants Jessica’s help. As a typhoon locks the family inside, pressure builds, secrets spill, and love turns volatile. With her father, Gary, caught in the middle, this darkly funny, emotionally explosive drama asks: can a mother and daughter forgive each other before time runs out?

LAFPI: Why did you write this play?

Jenn Meylan: I wrote this play because I wanted to share a story from a deeply personal and distinctly Taiwanese perspective that is rarely seen on stage. Through the story, I explore questions of death, family, and dignity at the end of life, and the difficult choices that accompany serious illness. My hope is to create space for meaningful conversations about death and family dynamics.

LAFPI: Which playwrights do you find most inspiring?

The playwrights I find most inspiring are actually the ones who are working on developing new works and putting their writing out there. I am part of a group of mostly women writers who regularly develop new works and give each other critiques – I find those playwrights most inspiring bc it takes a tremendous amount of courage to write, share, and receive feedback on shitty first drafts.

LAFPI: What would you like audiences to ask you about this play?

Jenn: Where the story came from, what parts are from everyday life, and what parts are uniquely from the Taiwanese diaspora.

Lee Chen, Cameron Dye and Stephanie Lee in rehearsal for “Her Way (隨 她而流)”

“Her Way (隨 她而流)”, by Jenn Melyan and directed by Hannah Eden Chodos, plays July 11 at 6:00pm and July 12 at 1:30pm


The SheLA Summer Theatre Festival runs Tuesday, July 7 – Sunday, July 12. For more information and to purchase tickets, go to shenycarts.org/she-la – Use code LAFPI20 at checkout for 20% off all ticket orders!

Know a female or FPI-friendly theater, company or artist? Contact us at lafpi.updates@gmail.com & check out The FPI Files for more stories.

Want to hear from more women artists? Make a Tax-Deductible Donation to LAFPI!

#FringeFemmes 2026: Meet Mozhdeh Rahmanzaei

By Constance Jaquay Strickland

Conversations with some of #HFF26’s compelling “Women on the Fringe”

Ten years ago, I conducted my first Fringe Femme interview out of a desperate need to hear and uplift the various works and voices of women of color during the Hollywood Fringe Festival. I selfishly wanted to bear witness, and in some small way, archive the multiplicity of beautiful conversations women of color were exploring. 

The reality was, I was having a hard time discovering and seeing the work of women of color. I knew I had a small network, no connections, and yet I still had found a way. Who else was out there existing as outliers? The hardest part of manifesting a new work is finding a way to let people know that you have a show. 

The 2026 Hollywood Fringe Femme Interview series is an ode to the women who find a way to tell their stories even when the odds are against them. Each year, a group of women dares to create work by any means necessary.

It is a pleasure to introduce Fringe Femme Mozhdeh Rahmanzaei. In a time when producing plays comes based on the season, Mozhdeh’s Freedom in Limbo is a stark reminder that writing plays comes at a high cost for many artists…

Oftentimes theatre does not exist on a schedule but is kept alive in the darkest of spaces, where light peaks through the hope and whispers of storytellers finding a way to tell the truth no matter the cost. That exile can be forced upon an individual, a choice to flee to survive or combat the practice being stifled, suffocated, or swallowed whole. No matter the why, exile separates and is traumatic physically and mentally. Yet for artists it also expands the how, and we find new ways to tell stories—innovation a natural response to a new environment. Have no confusion, though: exile is a collective issue and affects us all. 

I sit in the quiet of stillness in my little studio and speak aloud the names of artists, truthtellers on whose shoulders Mozhdeh stands: Wole Soyinka, Shirin Neshat, Elizabeth Catlett, Wilfredo Lam, Mona Hatoum, Isabel Allende, Emma Goldman, Assata Shakur, Dante Alighieri… this short list is long and continues growing and growing.

May Mozhdeh continue to be a link, a resource, a place of refuge + information while carrying, bearing and being the memory of home.

Mozhdeh Rahmanzaei

Constance Jaquay Strickland: How long have you been sitting with this work?

Mozhdeh Rahmanzaei: It has been quite a long process; this work started about 2 years ago, a few months before my graduation. It eventually became my thesis. Over time, I kept adding new material to the play, and it gradually grew from a 20-minute piece into a one-hour performance.

Constance: What led you to the Hollywood Fringe? Why now?

Mozhdeh
: When I decided to create this solo show, my intention was always to take it as far as possible and perform it in different cities. It started in Seattle, then moved to Portland and now Los Angeles. I wanted to understand different audiences and how they respond, and to keep building a dialogue through each place.

A key part of my motivation is to bring attention to the lived experience of artists in Iran. Many people, especially in the U.S., may have a general awareness that art in Iran exists under censorship and repression, but fewer people know the details of what that actually looks like on a daily, human level. As an artist, I feel a responsibility to bring those realities onto the stage.

I chose the Hollywood Fringe Festival because I believe stories from the Middle East are important here, and I want to introduce the Fringe audience to something that might feel different from what they usually see, something more personal, urgent, and grounded in lived experience.

Constance: Now, you’ve given the work away, and it’s out there. How does that feel?

Mozhdeh: It feels both freeing and vulnerable. I’ve given a very personal piece of myself to the world, and now it no longer fully belongs to me. But at the same time, that’s exactly what I wanted: to let it live outside of me and connect with people.

Constance: What’s been your biggest challenge in terms of the Fringe and your development process?

Mozhdeh: My biggest challenge has been wearing so many hats at the same time—I’ve been the producer, actor, writer, costume designer, and in many ways even the stage manager. Holding all of those roles simultaneously has been intense, but also deeply educational. Financially, it has also been challenging as someone who has recently graduated, but I’ve come to actually appreciate challenges. I believe they build resilience, and I feel like I’ve grown a lot stronger through this process.

Another challenge has been the distance in my collaboration with my director. We’ve been rehearsing over Zoom because he is in a different city while I’m based in Seattle, which has required a different kind of focus and discipline in the development process.

Constance: Can you speak a bit about the Underground Theatres of Iran? Is this where plays of banished playwrights still live? Where new stories are being told and archived with the body instead of the pen?

Mozhdeh: Underground theatre in Iran is similar to underground music. It is a space where artists spend years trying to obtain official permission to perform, and when they are unable to get approval, many eventually give up. In Iran, performances must be approved by the Department of Performing Arts to be staged. Without that permission, it is not possible to officially present a play. Some of my friends in Iran no longer even apply for permits to perform. One of them told me that they now stage their plays in their home garage and invite people there. It is a bit heartbreaking, but it is the reality.

Constance: Silence. To stay silent, you say, is the cost of no home. Eternally, I feel I understand that. Yet can you give insight into what that means or represents to you, Mozhdeh?

Mozhdeh: For me, silence is never just the absence of words—it is a condition of survival. It is what people are forced into when speaking becomes too dangerous, too costly, or simply unheard. In that sense, silence becomes both protection and imprisonment at the same time.
When I say that silence is the cost of having no home, I mean that in exile or displacement, you often learn that speaking freely can make you even more vulnerable, while silence allows you to endure. But endurance is not the same as freedom.

So silence represents a tension: it is the space where you stay alive, but also where parts of your truth remain unspoken. The work is my attempt to break that silence—not by erasing it, but by making it visible and shared.

Constance: In your play, you also speak Farsi.  I love that audiences have the chance to hear an ancient language onstage right in Hollywood. Is it difficult to write a multilingual play?

Mozhdeh: Yes, it wasn’t that difficult. Maybe it was challenging at first, but it became easier over time. In fact, I enjoy performing some of the lines in English. Acting in two languages has also helped me as an actor—it has made me more aware of how each language affects my body and presence on stage, and how switching between them changes the way I perform.

Constance: Also, what clues or revelations have you discovered about what it means to be seen or go unseen?

Mozhdeh: What I discovered is that being seen is not only about visibility on stage, but about being truly understood in your complexity as a human being. In this process, I realized that we are often most seen when there is genuine listening, presence, and openness from others. At the same time, being unseen is not always about physical absence—it can happen even in a crowd, when your inner world, your history or your truth is not acknowledged. This work taught me that theatre has the power to shift that experience, even briefly, by creating a space where someone’s silence, voice and presence can finally be witnessed.

Constance: What joy did you discover when creating your show?

Mozhdeh: Culture and art can act like a bridge between two different worlds and ways of thinking. One of the greatest joys I discovered while creating this show was learning how to build something together through two different languages and perspectives. My director and I come from different cultures and artistic approaches, and I realized how exciting and inspiring that difference can be. It became a space of exchange, discovery, and creative energy.

Constance: Did you face any obstacles?

Mozhdeh: One of the biggest obstacles for me in creating this play, and especially in performing it, was that I had to act out moments on stage that I had personally experienced years ago and that were part of my own life. But I did it because, in my view, the stage is a place where we must be honest and tell the truth about reality.

Constance: So what has it cost you (and ‘cost’ goes beyond money) to bring Freedom in Limbo to the Hollywood Fringe?

Mozhdeh: Bringing Freedom in Limbo to the Hollywood Fringe has cost me far more than money. It required months of work, emotional vulnerability, and the courage to revisit painful memories of exile and displacement. As an immigrant artist far from my family and homeland, every step of this process has demanded persistence, sacrifice, and faith in the importance of telling this story. Yet despite the cost, I believe these stories deserve to be heard.

Constance: After the lights and the audience disappear, what do you hope one remembers or takes away after seeing your show?

Mozhdeh: After the lights go out and the audience leaves, I hope they carry with them a sense of shared humanity. I want them to remember that behind every story of displacement or silence, there is a person who continues to dream, to question, and to survive. If anything remains, I hope it is a feeling—that even in moments of loss and uncertainty, connection is still possible, and voices that have been silenced still find a way to be heard.

Never give up. I kept going until it finally happened.

Constance: Is your play a love letter or a plea to Iran? Do you believe theatre is a bridge to healing and rebuilding?

Mozhdeh: I believe theatre can be a form of healing—I truly believe in it. And this is not a shout toward Iran, but a shout for Iran—perhaps one day, our voices and our demand for freedom will be heard.

Constance: Can one ever return home after exile?

Mozhdeh: Definitely no.

Constance: What is lost from exile? Not only for the individual or their family, but for Iran?

Mozhdeh: This work was shaped by both personal experience and witnessing the experiences of others. As an artist forced to leave my homeland, I have lived with displacement, uncertainty, and the feeling of being caught between two worlds. At the same time, I have witnessed the struggles of countless Iranians—artists, activists and ordinary people—whose voices have been silenced or suppressed. This piece grew out of both my own journey and the stories I carry with me from those who could not speak freely for themselves.

Constance: As an African-American woman whose ancestors were stolen from their home and tongue, I often think about the idea of home, memory, displacement, and what is left from that rupture. What have you learned about displacement and what ‘Home’ means?

Mozhdeh: To me, this separation carried a deeper meaning. It taught me that a country, a homeland, a land—at its core—means family. That is what I came to understand. Home means family, something I had never truly understood before. If I were to describe it, I would say that home is the place where you can walk freely and without fear, without constantly worrying that you might fall.

Constance: Can anywhere else ever replace ‘Home’?

Mozhdeh: No. A new place can offer safety, opportunities, and even happiness, but it can never fully replace home. Home is more than a place; it is the people, memories, and sense of belonging that stay with us wherever we go.

For info on Freedom in Limbo at the Hollywood Fringe, visit https://www.hollywoodfringe.org/projects/12444

Go Here for More About Mozhdeh Rahmanzaei

#FringeFemmes 2026: Meet Destiny Faith

By Constance Jaquay Strickland

Conversations with some of #HFF26’s compelling “Women on the Fringe”

Ten years ago, I conducted my first Fringe Femme interview out of a desperate need to hear and uplift the various works and voices of women of color during the Hollywood Fringe Festival. I selfishly wanted to bear witness and, in some small way, archive the multiplicity of beautiful voices and conversations women of color were exploring.

The reality was, I was having a hard time discovering and seeing the work of women of color. I knew I had a small network, no connections, and yet I still found a way. Who else was out there existing as outliers? The hardest part of manifesting a new work is finding a way to let people know that you have a show.

The 2026 Hollywood Fringe Femme Interview series is an ode to the women who find a way to tell their stories even when the odds are against them. Each year, a group of women dares to create work by any means necessary.

This year, I am beyond thrilled to introduce the first of this tiny but mighty cohort, Destiny Faith, actor + writer of The End of the World.

A solo show that is not afraid to address topics that are continually under-recognized, undiscussed or addressed without care, I was moved by the audacity and vulnerability Destiny brings to The End of the World… reminding us that our humanity, our capacity to hold emotions, feelings, fears and concerns are what makes up a healthy, forgiving and empathy-led community, society and culture. She reminds us that Black women are not monolithic, that we contain multitudes. She breaks stereotypes of staying silent and carrying the torch of Black women’s strength by boldly releasing, writing and sharing her perspective with the world. No longer allowing to go unseen.

Destiny Faith

Constance Jaquay Strickland: How long have you been sitting with this work? What led you to the Hollywood Fringe Festival and why now?

Destiny Faith: Hmm, this question is interesting for me because there are aspects of this work I’ve been sitting with for a long time. I’ve wanted to do a solo show for years, but had no idea what it would be about. The themes around mental health, existentialism and the loneliness of trying to connect in a disconnected world had been with me for a while, showing up again and again through different events in my life. A couple of years ago, I performed a seven-minute spoken-word piece at an open mic at Willie Agee Playhouse in Inglewood titled the Token Black Girl. It came out of a sudden awareness (almost a punch to the gut) of how subtle and constant the dehumanization of Black women is, and how little I’d actually let myself register it in my life.

That newfound awareness made me bitter and heartbroken, and I still haven’t fully gotten over it. After sharing that spoken-word piece and getting a strong response, people told me I should turn it into a one-woman show, and so I eventually did. Black women’s pain gets minimized so consistently that depression isn’t even on the table as a possibility for us. So I built a character who refuses that silence. She’s going to do the unthinkable, and she’s going to be loud about it. I wanted Hollywood Fringe first because it’s my backyard. I’ve been attending for years, and before I ran in Edinburgh, I wanted my own community’s eyes on it first.

Constance: Now, you’ve given the work away and it’s out there. How does that feel?

Destiny: It feels like it’s no longer just my own. I set out to tell my story, to be heard, to feel seen through art. And along the way, others have felt seen, too, and started sharing their own stories back. It’s humbling. It’s a reminder that whatever sits and persists in your heart isn’t just for you. It’s there, begging to be let out, because someone else needs it. That’s humbling, and it makes me want to make more.

Constance: What are you enjoying most as you create your show?

Destiny: I’m enjoying laughing and playing with the audience. I’m finally at a point where I feel more dropped into this role, into Desiree’s journey, which has let me really listen to and move with the audience. So every show has been different. I’m finally out of my head and can play.

Constance: What has been the most surprising discovery?

Destiny: I’ve been most surprised by how connected people are to little nuances in the story that I thought were so weird or so specific to me, that I almost didn’t put them in. I’m always shocked at how connected people feel to those exact moments.

Constance: What’s been your biggest challenge in terms of the Fringe?

Destiny: The biggest challenge, and I think a lot of other indie creators can relate to this, is having a vision much bigger than your pockets. I dream big, and I care so much about the integrity of the story, but you have such limited time and space to make everything the way you want it to be. I hated having to cut things that I felt would’ve made the show stronger, but cutting things has only made me get clearer and more specific about the experience I want my audience to have with the story.

Constance: What do you hope audience members take away from your show?

Destiny: I hope audiences get offline and look people in the eye. I’m begging us not to lose our humanity to social media and AI. It’s not real. These moments in the theater are real. The moments in nature, at the beach, are real. Everyone’s right and wrong about everything, but who we are as people extends beyond our 150-characters online. If we actually slowed down and sat with one another, and genuinely held space for one another, we’d feel less alone. (If we don’t learn to be human first, AI will do it for us…and take over our booooooddiiiiieeeeesssss :P)

Constance: How does spoken word help in telling the show’s story?

Destiny: I view spoken word in this show almost like a musical number. Sometimes we don’t have the perfect words to say, but a song always seems to do the trick. Music and rhythm can take something complex and full of nuance and help it land somewhere palatable, somewhere memorable. The spoken word isn’t just a peek into Desiree’s inner world; it also marks the significant milestones in her journey.

Constance: It’s not easy being a Black woman in any decade, but it sure is a privilege. How has letting go of the strong Black women trope freed you as an artist and woman?

Destiny: Such a good question, because I don’t know if I’ve fully let it go yet. But I’m learning to free myself more and more and allowing myself to be broken and vulnerable, imperfect. Allowing myself to not always work twice as hard, to not care about a trope that minimizes my humanity, just because I’m upset. The more I let go of caring how the world perceives me, the more I’m able to fully connect to myself. And connection to self gives us space for true healing. In this show, Desiree gets to be everything that Black women “shouldn’t be”: depressed, joyful, angry, scared, rude, bratty, funny, and hopeful. 

Constance: What joy did you discover when creating your show?

Destiny: The joy I discovered was getting to play and be funny. Most people see me do drama, and a lot of my life I’ve had to be serious and responsible—but I have a dry, goofy side that only a few people get to see. It’s great to expose that part of me in an environment that’s safe, that’s my own, and in my own voice. I don’t often see my type of humor represented in Black characters, so there’s real joy in getting to be what I don’t usually get to be or see.

Constance: What has it cost you to bring The End of the World to life?

Destiny: It has cost me so much sleep! Lol. 

Constance: What experience influenced this new work?

Destiny: This story is very personal to me. When I sat down to reflect on what my show should be about, I thought about major turning points in my life that I believe have contributed to who I am as a person. Two moments kept coming to mind in conjunction with each other, in parallel, even though they were fifteen years apart: the day my stepdad attempted suicide in front of my family and me, and one of the lowest moments of my adult life, during the lockdown in 2020.

I was fifteen when my stepdad attempted suicide, and that was the worst day of my life at the time. My family and I were never the same since. Everything I thought was true about the world, my life, and my parents was shattered. I have clear distinctions in who each of my siblings and my mom was before and after that moment. It was my own end of the world, so to speak. Everyone can relate to a moment in their life when their innocence was destroyed, when the world showed you its ugliest parts and broke your faith, when you no longer felt the illusion of safety. Trauma changes all of us, and it can be heartbreaking to recognize that in yourself. There are motifs in the show that allude to that feeling of loss of innocence.

Then in 2020, I had a second version of this. I was so brokenhearted by friends, family and humanity as a whole that it made me feel cold and bitter, and it took so much to get “me” back. But I’m grateful for experiencing both sides of the spectrum: such hope and faith in humanity, to such disdain for it and resentment toward God. The grace of God and the beauty in humanity have outweighed the bad in the end, and I can finally heal from that heartbreak. It’s an ongoing and ever-evolving process, which is what I hope also lands in the show.

For info and tickets visit https://www.hollywoodfringe.org/projects/13431

“Urban Scholars” Joins the Ammo-nymous Plays of West Hollywood

By Alison Minami

This month I had the pleasure of participating in Ammunition Theatre’s Ammo-nymous Plays West Hollywood. My play “Urban Scholars” was one of six thrown into a hat and drawn for an on-the-spot cold reading with very talented company actors. This happened over three nights on the rooftop of the famed West Hollywood Fiesta Cantina, and I had the great fortune of hearing my play aloud for the very first time. The audience experience was delightful and satisfying on so many levels. Firstly, the acting chops of the readers were stellar (Eric Lyons: Matthew Harris; Nia Thao: Tina Huang; Jericho Thompson: Bubba Proctor; Heaven Ford: Tiana Randall Quant Stage Directions: Roxana Ortega). I could not believe how well they were cast and how adeptly they took on their roles having never read the script. The play turned out so much funnier than I had remembered. This was unintentional, and so, a pleasant surprise. But also, the play took me back to a very specific time in my life and dealt with an issue that I have been grappling with intellectually for a long time—charter schools.

My first full-time professional job as an educator was at high school in East Harlem. I’d taught before that in Japan, but that had felt more like a paid study abroad program where I traveled classrooms as a teacher’s aide to facilitate conversational English games. Those ordered, pristine hallways were far different from the ones housed within the New York City Board of Education. I worked at the Urban Peace Academy, which was a euphemism for failing public school, and less than five years after I left, the school permanently shuttered, no doubt at the mercy of changing political winds and the latest performative resolve to overhaul a broken educational system. Whatever the reasons for the closure, my experience there very quickly disabused me of the notion that public school was always the best option for everyone. I went from thinking I would never send my kid to private school to I would never send my kid to this public school. Of course, at the time, I didn’t have any kids, so all of that was just righteous indignation. Having gone to a very reputable public high school, I had been a champion of public education, scoffing at the elitism of any other alternative. Yes, I had studied inequities in education; that was why I was there in the first place. But my doe-eyed naivete about how to impact student learning came up against all the obvious challenges that I’d only read about in collegiate academic settings –ie. poverty, hunger, disability, domestic abuse, racism obviously. Not to mention, all the challenges that I might (and did) face as young, petite, Asian American woman teaching classrooms full of Black and Latinx students who were less than a decade younger than I was, amidst teachers who were twice my age.  I had always been greatly offended by how inner-city schools were portrayed on television and in movies; the depictions were racist, stereotypical, reductive, and over the top. But teaching in an inner-city school, I was loathe to admit that, at least on the surface, much of the chaos and authoritarianism tracked. The disrespect towards students and from them is an endless feedback loop.

The most memorable day of my brief high school teaching career was the day before the Winter holiday, when our school principal was escorted out of the building by Board of Education officials in dark suits. They stood outside her office so as not to allow her access to her computer or anything else. To make matters worse, students had been told there’d be an early dismissal, but our school visitors determined that we had not been authorized to permit an early dismissal. I distinctly remember forcing students to remain in an auditorium where we were showing a completely, inappropriate R-rated film and barring them from exiting when the film ended. At day’s end, all the teaching staff were gathered in a classroom and told that when we returned from our Winter holiday, we would have a new principal. And this was a promise kept; we never again saw or heard from our old school principal. This day was emblematic of many more memories I have of my time there.

It should’ve been a tell when I went in for my interview. The principal did not get up from her desk to greet me, nor did she walk me around the school. Instead, she presented me with a trifold brochure of the school with colored photos of the basketball team and some other clubs. She was most definitely selling harder to me than the other way around, and I, being young, new to New York, and hungry for employment didn’t think twice that she didn’t ask me a single question about myself or my philosophy on teaching as she marveled at my very spare resume.

Anyway, I digress. I’ve always been against charter schools. After teaching in a public school, I understood the moral outrage behind the anti-charter school movement. I learned the talking points—how charter schools siphoned away money from the regular public schools and created greater inequities despite claiming to remedy them; how they were largely unregulated and often discriminatory; how they partnered with large corporations with ulterior motives; how they manipulated their enrollments and results to fulfill their mandates; how they stole the brightest kids from the student populations of traditional public schools. Now many years later, as a parent learning about the strategies to get your child into the best public school, I see the other side of the charter school debate. I can’t tell you how many times I hear parents say, “I don’t want to send my kid to a charter school, but I have no other option.” I know it reeks of class and privilege, but I can’t say I entirely blame them.

To further drive a wedge in the debate is the common practice of charters co-locating with larger, traditional public schools. Co-location is when a small school is housed within as larger multi-story school buildings owned by the district. For example, Urban Peace Academy was a small school, housed on a single floor of a three-story public school building. While my school was not a charter school, we experienced much of the tension between school communities forced to share key spaces; such as, the auditorium, the cafeteria, the gymnasium, etc.

“Urban Scholars” is a play that aims to explore the complexities of the charter school debate through the relationship between two warring principals, Ms. Thao and Mr. Lyons as they are forced in a co-location agreement by the district. Further, the play addresses the micro-aggressions of race, gender, and age in the workplace, and the ways in which authority and power are constantly mediated between colleagues, teachers, and students. In the end, amidst all the educational politicking, it is the students who suffer. That sounds so cliché that it’s easy to forget what that could look like, and I hope this play offers a glimpse.

Some interesting links on charters and co-location:

https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policy-topics/education-training-labor/weighing-charter-school-debate

https://www.bkreader.com/policy-government/tensions-rise-in-brooklyns-sunset-park-over-charter-school-plans-10871626

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-07-25/court-strikes-down-l-a-unified-policy-to-keep-charter-schools-off-campuses

The FPI Files: Finding Empathy in Echo’s “For Want of a Horse”

by Casey Fleming

“PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE DON’T TELL ANYONE HOW THIS PLAY ENDS!” reads the page two playbill note of For Want of a Horse, staged by Atwater Village’s Echo Theater Company. 

Here is where I would put a brisk, snappy summary of the play for you – an implied promise that I won’t be perfectly keeping, because I’m not quite sure how I would explain this world premiere. This, I believe, is a compliment to the audaciousness of playwright Olivia Dufault who, in her “darkly comic, deeply human exploration of love, desire and unconventional relationships,” brings to the stage something challenging and deeply, unusually original.

From the Echo’s website, continued: “Calvin is devoted to his wife, Bonnie. But if Calvin is going to move forward, he needs to open up their relationship to include his new romantic partner. One complication: that partner would be Q-Tip – and Q-Tip is a horse.”

Jenny Soo, Joey Stromberg and Griffin Kelly – Photo by Cooper Bates

Put simply and likely predictably, it’s a shocking play. It is a testament to the writing, direction, and performance of the play that its innumerable shocking moments never felt played for the sake of shock alone, and even a note as direct as the plea in the playbill felt entirely warranted. Leaving the show, I heard two audience members say to one another that they’d have so much to talk about on the car ride home. What other marker of success should we determine theatre by? I don’t know exactly how to explain this play to you, nor to myself, nor what it made me walk away thinking, exactly. But I did walk away asking myself a multitude of questions and for that, I am grateful.

Prominently among these questions – on my way out and still now, as I sit writing – was why does it matter that a trans woman wrote this? As evident later on in this piece, I was able to send questions to playwright Olivia Dufault following the performance. I’m not sure I could tell you why, but I didn’t choose to ask a single one about gender. Sitting in the audience watching, my own trans-ness surfaced and stayed top of mind, and I felt my own interpretation of the play deeply and monumentally ground itself in what I heard the show say about gender, from its first line and every moment forward. What did it change, to me, knowing that this show was written by someone who shares an aspect of this identity? Everything. Nothing. Or in truth, something, somewhere in the murky space in between quiet relation and direct confrontation and a long, long road adorned with familiar waypoints, headed into the unknown.

Joey Stromberg and Jenny Soo – Photo by Cooper Bates

In addition to being trans, I’m aromantic- & asexual-spectrum – a set of identities that, upon their declaration, outline an even greater gulf between me and what/who this play works to portray. The profoundly distinct and distant experience I have with all types of romantic attraction thoroughly colored the type of attention I paid to this show, most explicably manifesting as what I think I’d term ‘heightened awareness’ of the questions it was asking in the moments and motions they were asked. An early line from Bonnie (played by Jenny Soo) about her reckoning with a difficult schoolchild echoed over and over again in my head: ‘as long as you’re not hurting anybody.’ As long as you’re not hurting anybody, as long as you’re not hurting anybody. You could take any word of that sentence and challenge it with this play. What is hurt, exactly? Who decides? How am I, the person sitting beneath the house lights, currently making that decision? “Anybody” accounts for who? What are the limits to empathy?

To dive further into the answers this play offers, and really, what challenges it strives to leave unanswered and openly on the table, I was able to send some questions to playwright Olivia Dufault who shared insight into the evolution, intention and staging of this world premiere.


Casey Fleming: Olivia, I read that your inspiration for this play came from your own reaction to an atypical interview (a New York magazine article entitled “What It’s Like to Date a Horse,” published in 2014). What, within your own experience reading and engaging with the article, made you feel that you HAD to write this play? 

Olivia Dufault

Olivia Dufault: When I first read the interview that inspired this play, my immediate response was shock, horror, and perverse amusement. But as I continued, I began to feel terrible pangs of empathy for everyone involved in the tragic situation – the husband, the wife, the horse. I found myself conflicted by these emotions; to what degree was empathy an appropriate response in this context? From this internal wrestling, this strange play emerged.

Casey: Walking out of the show, I heard a pair of audience members discussing how lively their conversation in the car on the way home would be. What two questions do you hope audience members walk away from this show asking themselves?

Olivia: What are the benefits and perils of empathy? And what exactly goes on in the head of a horse? 

Casey: What did you learn about yourself over the course of working on this play?

Olivia:
I have a high tolerance for discomforting topics. Audacious subject matter invites audacious collaborators. And that it’s shockingly easy to write from the point of view of a barnyard animal.

Casey: How does your idea of what a playwright should do or be responsible for doing – universally, at scale – inform your approach to writing For Want of a Horse?

Olivia:
Honestly, I wrote this play ten years ago, and did so very much for myself. That’s always been my relationship with my work. This play was made to challenge and amuse me; I hope it does the same for others.


I was lucky enough to get to speak with another artist who was challenged and amused by For Want of a Horse – director Elana Luo. She spoke directly to her experience working on the play and the practical, emotional, and logistical learnings that accompanied. 

Casey: In interpreting “challenge” to mean both content and technical ask, where were the areas of greatest challenge while directing this play? How did you approach and guide the cast/crew through them?

Elana Luo


Elana Luo:
The play moves quickly between scenes in different locations, so we had to figure out how to utilize and transform the space accordingly, or perhaps not. It was a feat of coordination between all departments Alex Mollo’s set, Leah Morrison’s costumes, Matt Richter’s lights, Alysha Bermudez’s sounds, and the actors who had to wrangle it all. I’m very grateful to my cast and crew for their collaboration and ingenuity.

Casey: Over the course of working on For Want of a Horse, what part of your understanding of the show shifted the most between table read and opening night?

Elana:
I got to understand each of the characters much more intimately. Steve [Steven Culp], Griffin [Kelly], Jenny [Soo] and Joey [Stromberg] all brought their own perspectives and truly embody their roles, which has added more layers and realism to Olivia’s already well-drawn characters.

Casey: How has For Want of a Horse changed your approach to directing or helped you grow?

Elana:
I’ve never directed a horse before. Lots of poop and subsequent mucking thereof. It’s a very humbling experience for a big and important director such as myself.

Casey: If you were to break down your vision for the technical design of the show into a few key words, what would they be?

Elana:
Beautiful. Beastly. Hopefully Disney doesn’t come after us.

For Want of a Horse,” written by Olivia Dufault and directed by Echo associate artistic director Elana Luo, runs at the Atwater Village Theatre through May 25th. For more information and to purchase tickets, call (747) 350-8066 or go to EchoTheaterCompany.com.

Know a female or FPI-friendly theater, company or artist? Contact us at lafpi.updates@gmail.com & check out The FPI Files for more stories.

Want to hear from more women artists? Make a Tax-Deductible Donation to LAFPI!

The FPI Files: Returning Soldiers Speak… Now, Their Families’ Stories

by Leilani Squire

I was born and raised in the military. My father was deployed on an aircraft carrier off the coast of Okinawa when I was born at Tripler Army Hospital on the outskirts of Honolulu. This was during the Korean War. He served thirty years in the Navy, which means I grew up inside the military complex.

It is different to be raised in the military instead of being raised in the civilian world. As I write this, I see how I really can’t explain the difference because I do not have a reference to what it means to grow up outside of the military. Perhaps this is one of the reasons I thought of the playwriting project Military Family Staged Readings—to better understand the bridge between the two worlds.

There is also a difference between those who wear the uniform and those who wait for the return of the deployed. Each experiences the military in a different way, and hard as we try, there remains a gap of understanding, of experiences. My father was deployed many times—leaving on a big ship and returning six months or a year later. When he left I was one way, and when he returned I was a different person. We both changed during his deployment and it took time to reconnect and establish our relationship as father and daughter.

You may wonder why I begin this blog post about a child whose father deploys to a far away country and what that has to do with playwriting and the theater. Most people in our society do not understand what it means to be a spouse, child, mother or father of those who wear the uniform.

a military funeral at Arlington National Cemetery

Since 2010, I have worked with Veterans helping them tell their stories through poetry, prose, and playwriting through the organization Returning Soldiers Speak. As rewarding and meaningful and important as this work has been, I yearned to do something different. I wanted to honor the family members of the military.

I guess you could say that I wanted to honor my mother who was a military wife for thirty years. And my sisters who moved from place to place with each new set of orders. And that little girl who waited for her father’s return. So, I wrote a proposal of a playwriting project for Veterans and family members—playwriting workshops that would culminate in a series of staged readings for the public—and submitted it to the City of Los Angeles Department of Cultural Affairs.  We were awarded the grant (that is, a matching grant) and began the playwriting workshops last fall.

The interview process was challenging because each person was wonderful and full of potential and passion, but due to the constraints of our budget, we couldn’t accept all of them.

Our playwrights are Benjamin Fortier, a Marine Corps Veteran who was in Fallujah in 2006; Gregory Hillman, a Marine Corps Veteran who was deployed to Afghanistan; Jeffrey Webster, a Coast Guard Veteran who does ceremonies for Veterans in Hospice; Bryan Caldwell, a grandson of a Navy Captain; Denah Angel, a daughter whose father served in the Air Force during the Vietnam War; and Liisa Rose, a wife whose husband was an Air Force Colonel who served for almost twenty-nine years.

Some live in Los Angeles, others live in various parts of the country. The challenge has been how to bring all of us together—and so enter Zoom. It amazes me how intimate the workshops have been using this virtual platform.

Liisa Rose and her husband, Mark

One Saturday morning during our Zoom playwriting workshop, we were focusing on Liisa Rose’s play.  Her play asks the question: Is the current state of the country worth giving one’s life for? This is a provocative question to ask at any time, but to ask this question during these turbulent times is daring, brave, and important.

Support and Defend is the title of Liisa’s play and the main character faces the challenges of grieving the death of her husband (a character who died while deployed to Afghanistan) and raising her two almost-adult children. Much of Liisa’s play draws upon her own experiences in the military (but thank goodness she and her husband are living happily in Arizona).

At one point in our conversation, Liisa began telling us about a very personal experience that happened when her husband returned home from yet another deployment. I asked her if she had written about that and she said no. I suggested she write a monologue for the main character. She did. And then she wrote a scene based on their experience. It is one of the most powerful things I have ever heard or read.

She debated whether the scene belonged in the play, and if it did, where in the play’s structure would the scene reveal what it needs to reveal? She also wondered what her husband would say if she told him that she wanted to write this scene. He told her that would be okay. And ultimately, we decided that the play needs it.

It has been my honor to work with Liisa; she is a good playwright and has written an important play. The question she poses about weighing the current state of one’s country drives the story forward, and invites us to look with new awareness and search for an answer. After each reading, the playwright and the audience will engage in dialogue. I am curious what shape the dialogue will take after hearing Support and Defend.

Denah Angel Shenkman

Our other wonderful female playwright is Denah Angel Shenkman. I know Denah from Ensemble Studio Theatre/LA where we have worked together for many projects—I as a playwright and Denah as an actor.

A while ago, Denah told me the story about the Greek side of her family. During World War Two, the family’s house was taken over by the Nazis and her two aunts had to fend for themselves. They eventually escaped and found their way to America and joined their father. Theirs was complicated journey and a fascinating journey. I knew this project would be an opportunity for Denah to begin writing about her ancestors.

In writing her play, Denah has drawn upon her family’s story, and at the same time embraced the creative process of letting the story and the characters define the play. She has known all along what story she wants to tell, and it has been exciting to watch her take the leap into an unknown place and find the elements and aspects of the characters and their journeys.

One of the first times (if not the first time) Denah, Jim Lunsford (our wonderful dramaturge) and I met, she said that she wanted to write a love story. She wanted to show the complexities of what it means to live during war and to discover love in that harsh and brutal world. She began with three characters, added another character, and then another character to deepen and strengthen the theme, conflict, story and plot. She has drawn upon her Greek heritage in subtle and not-so-subtle ways that add spice and flavor, history and authenticity to the play. How she weaves Greek mythology throughout the characters’ lives—their relationships and their dialogue—makes sense in this world of her creation, and invites us to envision what it means to live in a place rooted in mythology.

We might inquire: How does ancient mythology speak to me in the 21st century? What can I learn? How might I use myth to create myth? What can I learn from the historical context of the play that will serve me during these turbulent times? For me to ask such questions means the playwright has done the work and written a play of meaning and authenticity. I am excited to bear witness to the dialogue between the playwright and the audience after the reading of An Era.

Denah Angel and Leilani Squire (top, l to r) with dramaturge Jim Lunsford

I must give a shout out to Jim Lunsford, our incredible dramaturge. I couldn’t have done this project without him. He understands theater in a way that I wish I did. He sees through to the essences of structure in a way that I wish I did. He envisions the whole picture, while I see the specifics—we make a wonderful team.

I am directing An Era and honored and excited to be doing so. Keith Szarabajka and Joe Garcia will direct readings as well.

The staged reading series begins with Denah Angel Shenkman’s An Era on March 25 and closes with Liisa Rose’s Support and Defend  on April 29.

There are four other staged readings in the series that will also be awesome:

  • April 1 – Gregory Hillman, Self-less
  • April 8 – Benjamin Fortier, The Park
  • April 15 – Jeffrey Webster, Killing to the Sound of Trumpets
  • April 22 – Bryan Caldwell, Flowers From Hell

I hope you join us for these wonderful plays, engage in the dialogue after the reading,and enjoy the camaraderie of community.

Military Family Staged Readings take place March 25 – April 29, Wednesdays at 7:30pm, followed by dialogues between the playwrights and audiences. The readings take place at Sawyer’s Playhouse, 11031 Camarillo Street in North Hollywood, CA. Donations will be gratefully accepted. For more info, visit returningsoldiersspeak.org/military-family-staged-readings-project

Know a female or FPI-friendly theater, company or artist? Contact us at lafpi.updates@gmail.com & check out The FPI Files for more stories.

Want to hear from more women artists? Make a Tax-Deductible Donation to LAFPI!

“Red Harlem” in a World Premiere at The Company of Angels Theater of Los Angeles

By Alison Minami

It is little known historical fact that in 1932, the Communist Party of the USA spearheaded a film project highlighting the plight of Black Americans that was fully paid for and sponsored by Joseph Stalin. Over a dozen Black Americans were recruited from Harlem to travel to the Soviet Union for filming and production, and Langston Hughes was hired to revise the screenplay in order to make the story and its characters more realistic and responsive to the Black American experience. At the time, James Ford, a Black Tennesseean who became a prominent civil rights leader, was the Vice-Presidential candidate on the American Communist Party’s presidential ticket. It was Ford who convinced Stalin to fund the film as a way to garner support for the Communist Party more globally. The film was absolutely a propagandist project against American capitalism, but for many of the Black actors involved, it was the first time they felt seen, heard, and respected as artists. Red Harlem is a play that imagines the lives of four of these artists as they embark upon a journey from the Cotton Club of Harlem to the vibrant nightclub scene in Berlin to the grandeur of Moscow where they are treated for the first time as first-class citizens, free from the unrelenting racism they’ve known their whole lives in America.

Red Harlem is having its World Premiere with the Company of Angels Theater in Los Angeles. For me, watching the play in full production was particularly gratifying as I had the pleasure of participating in the Company of Angels’ Professional Playwrights’ Group with the playwright Kimba Henderson back in 2021. At the time, Red Harlem was in its very early development; Kimba was still discovering the character arcs and their relationships to one another. To see the fully fleshed camaraderie between the members of this tight-knit group, despite their conflicting needs, desires, and fears, was incredibly satisfying and moving.

Photo by Rafael Cardenas

The world of the play is big and all-encompassing in terms of the diversity of characters and the depth of human experience in the 1930s. What makes it so dynamic is that it is transnational, transpolitical, and transracial. All the borders are blurred as Kimba resists the urge to put her characters into their own separate boxes. Here there are no clean-cut dichotomies of good vs. evil, moral vs. immoral, or villains vs. heroes. Lenore, a staunch Communist, falls for David, a Jewish man from Brooklyn whom Lenore believes to be half-black. Shifty is a member of the working class, a person with no party affiliation, but one with a keen eye for hustle, and an eventual soft spot for Velma, the cross-dressing nightclub manager in Berlin. Selena and Will are a couple who love and support each other’s aspirations but are susceptible to competition and jealousy as the power between them shifts once in the Soviet Union. Misha, the general who is appointed handler to the actors, is providing cover for the Communist Party whilst growing his empathy for the eclectic group under his charge. And finally, there’s Colonel Cooper, factually the world-renowned engineer who constructed the Dnieper Dam for the Soviets and brought electricity to millions, who also happens to run into this film production and plays an influential role in shutting it down. At every turn, the characters’ own core beliefs are challenged through their encounters in a new land, across racial and cultural borders.

One of the more interesting aspects of the play for me is how Kimba addresses colorism. Selena, a regular dancer at the Cotton Club, is employable because of her light skin tone, while Lenore knows all too well the sting of rejection simply because of her darker complexion. In the Soviet Union, this color hierarchy is switched, and Lenore feels like her talent can finally shine. Simultaneously, Lenore falls for David but feels betrayed when she learns that he is Jewish and not a light skinned Black person as he’d allowed her to believe. All the nuanced assumptions around race—and what it means to be Black in America vs. elsewhere—reminded me of how much race has been socially constructed for the purpose of building an American empire.

In talking with Kimba, we discuss the significance of historical fiction and the import of Red Harlem today. Kimba says, “I don’t want to write something if I don’t feel it’s relevant” and how “the play kept getting more and more relevant.” She points out, by way of example, how the Brownshirts were like the Proud Boys, and how the Nazi rhetoric mirrors much of what we hear from our polarizing President. And too, the fight for world dominance and ideological superiority, at the expense of masses of civilian populations, is age-old and still at play in a war that is happening right now as I write this.

Playwright Kimba Henderson

Further, I always like to ask other writers about their process. It’s out of my personal desire to glean their magic tricks: How did they do it? What’s in the secret sauce?  For Kimba, she quips, “flow writing.” When she worked with the Robey Theatre Company, she had a mentor encourage her to place her characters in a place they’d never normally be, and to explore through freewriting, why they happened to be there and how they dealt with the discomfort. Kimba frequently employs What-if writing exercises like this, particularly in the world-building phase of her development. She says that she has pages and pages of such kind of writing on each of her characters, scribblings that never make it to the final play. She knows them and their pasts so well that when she’s asked any dramaturgical question, she can readily imagine how a character might respond. In one of her best examples, Kimba describes a late addition to play, a scene where David writes a heartfelt letter to Selena apologizing for withholding the truth about his being Jewish. In it, he tries to explain his philosophy on life, recounting a memory of his father standing outside Small’s Paradise, a Harlem Jazz club, tapping his foot and enjoying the music but never allowing himself entry. David never wanted to live his life like his father, standing on the perimeter of life’s joy.

The play is directed by Kimba’s longtime friend and artistic collaborator, Bernadette Speakes. Kimba credits Speakes for her ability to take viewers from setting to setting, across the globe with a small moving set of screens, some well curated projections, and a few stage blocks. Even in the 99-seater space, the play manages to pull off a kind of magical splendor. There are big musical and dance numbers with choreography and costuming befitting of professional entertainers and denizens of nightlife in the 1930s. The play is, after all, about performers and their passion for their art at all costs. Kimba says, “you can’t own people’s artistry. They own that. That is theirs,” and that this play, ultimately, is about these actors, each in their own way, “taking ownership of their artistry.”  That message carries resonance. At all times, both then and now, artists like myself and hopefully you the reader, through whatever sacrifices and concessions we have made, have been staking a claim to our creative lives.

This is a story that needs to be told, and I hope that it gets told many times over—on stages, on small and big screens, to classrooms full of historians, to world leaders who claim historical amnesia, and to all the artists of color who are still waiting for permission.

The World Premiere of Red Harlem at Company of Angels ran February 14 – March 15. Go Here for more information about the production.

World Premiere: A Subtle Kind of Murder

By Alison Minami

When others demand that we become the people they want us to be, they force us to destroy the person we really are.  It’s a subtle kind of murder.  —Jim Morrison

The play A Subtle Kind of Murder written by Dale Dunn had its world premiere at the New Mexico Actors Lab this past summer, and it has just been nominated for the Broadway World Awards in the categories of Best New Play, Best Director, Best Supporting Actor, Best Ensemble Acting, Best Scenic Design, Best Lighting Design, and Best Production! This achievement could not make me happier or be more inspiring for myself as a fellow playwright who offered feedback in the early stages of writing. I had the pleasure of being a part of Jennie Webb’s Next Draft Workshop with Dale back in 2021, reading early drafts of the script when the sinewy musculature hadn’t been fully realized and the thematic threads were not neatly tied. It is always satisfying to see a play come together after being a part of its developmental process. Dale knew clearly what she wanted to write about, but there was a lot of metaphor and symbolism within the overlapping worlds she was creating, especially tied to the multimedia aspect of her piece that needed shaping. What I remembered most about her play was that it was deeply feminist, and it spoke to the relentless sexism and abuse of young women who are trying to make something of themselves professionally. While I did not get to see the production, I reached out to Dale to read the latest production copy of the play. I’ve now just read it, and all I can say is that it leaves a reader breathless! I can only imagine what it was like to have a seat in the darkened theater. Five years in the making, and the final script is simultaneously heartbreaking, gut-punching and, dare I say, hopeful.

A Subtle Kind of Murder is a play seeded by a confluence of ideas (and worlds) that are all thematically tied to living as a woman in a sexually predatory patriarchy. Jane, an acclaimed novelist, has been hired to write a screenplay adaptation of the 1947 noir murder mystery novel In a Lonely Place by Dorothy B. Hughes. Under deadline to finish the script, Jane sequesters herself in her childhood home, a remote Kansas farmhouse with the Filmmaker, her staunch but strict motivator who encourages Jane to stay focused and get the job done. However, the two are unexpectedly interrupted by the Woman in Brown, a young, bright-eyed woman who stumbles into the farmhouse after being followed by the Man in the Hat. The Man in the Hat, a shadowy figure whose voice and presence is felt by all the women, but never materializes until play’s end, doubles as the serial killer from Hughes’ novel and the bigtime executive who once sexually assaulted Jane in a Hollywood studio, when she was once a young, naïve assistant, whose dreams of making it big in the industry were killed from the humiliating transgression.  Not coincidentally, Jane’s current writing contract is with the same Hollywood executive who assaulted her decades before; he does not recognize her because she’s taken on the pen name Jane Franklin, after Ben Franklin’s sister, a woman who never got an education nor a fair shot while her brother was given every resource to become the famous intellectual, inventor, and founding father. So, it’s fair to say, Jane has something to prove and an axe to grind.

As the play progresses, we start to gather that the Woman in Brown, like the Man in the Hat, doubles as the murder victim in the Hughes novel as well as the younger version of Jane. She is, as Jane describes her, “the young woman who had the nerve to think of the world as her oyster.” Both the Woman in Brown and the Filmmaker are versions of Jane at different stages of her life. They serve as figments of her imagination as she is haunted by the chilling veil of a man’s rapaciousness while she fights to claim her agency as a woman and an artist. Jane references her own acclaimed novel, which is the same title as this play, by describing a subtle kind of murder as the “the murder of the self.” Jane goes on to say “The subtle kind of murder leaves you in a sort of tortured half life….dazed…powerless…often fighting shame and regret.” As the three women argue over Jane’s chosen pen name, she declares “Jane. It’s every woman’s name.” Here is the crux of the play for me. Aren’t we women all Jane? Even in 2025, when there is lip service paid toward a #MeToo movement that holds powerful men accountable, it seems that for every jailed Weinstein, Cosby, or Epstein, there is another man lurking in the shadows, ready to decimate a woman as, in Dale’s words, “just another girl in the office.” Ultimately, as Dale describes, the play is about “self-forgiveness.” She says, “there are so many Why didn’t I?’s in life.” She is quick to answer the question:Well, you didn’t, and it’s okay. You have to look at it. And then leave it.”  She goes on to explain, “Jane is confronting her past, the assault that made her turn away from her ambitions, and she needs to see it for what it is in order to move past it and do the creative work she is meant to do.” The pain of regret and humiliation is suffocating, and it consumes so many victims of assault. But it’s not just physical assault that women contend with, it’s the multitude of micro-aggressions that tell us to behave, to please, to keep quiet, to wait our turn, to act right, to apologize, to shrink, to cower, and on and on and on. A woman must permit herself to reject it all, to say no, to get out from under the patriarchal power.

Dale Dunn, Playwright and Co-Artistic Director of Just Say It Theater

The play is a multi-media performance that utilizes film projection and sound to tell its story. Dale has a lot of experience using projections in her staged works. She sees it as a theatrical tool to serve as “an extension of the mind” and to be “inside the writer’s [Jane’s] mind” as opposed to being a place setter. Throughout the play there is the projection of Jane’s text as it is being typed, the thunderous and chilling projection of the ocean—the place where the Woman in Brown is found murdered—and of the diner into which the Woman in Brown escapes. All of the stage design and multimedia lends itself to the mirrored and mysterious worlds characteristic of the noir genre.

Dale herself is no newbie to the theater. She has worked in theaters across the nation including the Public Theater in New York and the Red Barn Theater in Key West. She co-founded her own theater in New Mexico called Just Say It Theater and has years of teaching experience in both playwriting and production at New Mexico School for the Arts. Her longtime theater partner, Lynn Goodwin served as both the dramaturg and director of A Subtle Kind of Murder, which explains the synergy, flexibility, experimentation, and care that the ensemble carried throughout the developmental process from table read to production.

I asked Dale whether or not she had a recording of the piece that I could view; Sadly, she didn’t have anything, only a muffled and grainy recording that wouldn’t do the play justice. At first, I felt that this was disappointing, but I also realize it’s sort of the point. Nothing can replace the ephemeral magic of theatre. I truly hope A Subtle Kind of Murder gets another production; It’s a play that every Jane (and John) should see.

East West Players in Good Hands: Meet Lily Tung Crystal

By Alison Minami

Lily Tung Crystal, artistic director of East West Players in Little Tokyo of Los Angeles, has made a full circle back to Southern California. While the path may have been unconventional and circuitous, every place she’s had the pleasure of making home along her artistic journey has contributed to her role as a thoughtful and influential leader in the Asian American theatre community.

Lily’s first stage was the raised fireplace of her childhood home in Rancho Palos Verdes. She’d use the handle of the fireplace screen pulley as her microphone and sing the showstoppers she’d learned from outings with her mother to the Pantages or the Ahmanson. Having once been a competitive dancer and carrying a natural ear for music, Lily’s mother held a deep appreciation for the arts and passed this on to her daughter. At the age of seven, Lily began taking singing and piano, which ultimately led her to musical theater—roles in Oliver, The Sound of Music, The Wizard of Oz to name a few. Despite being one of the better singers, Lily never got the lead, possibly because the directors couldn’t square Lily’s Asian face with the traditional white casting of these shows. At the time, representation was barely a conversation, and it never dawned on Lily that she could ever see her onstage talents as anything more than a hobby.

After graduating Cornell University, Lily moved to China to work as both an educator and a journalist. All the while she kept her hand in the theatre—but mostly as an avocation, something to keep her creative spirit nurtured. Eventually Lily made her way back to her home state of California, but this time to San Francisco, where she found herself joining community theatre and acting classes. Even as she was immersing herself in the Bay Area theatre scene, she never considered herself a professional actress despite joining the union and landing significant onstage roles. Claiming the identity was a slow process, and Lily recalls herself thinking, “Maybe I can say I’m an actor now. Can I really say that?”  Asking for permission is an all too familiar refrain for artists in the shadows, especially those of color—I certainly have had my fair share of imposter syndrome around my creative life—but once Lily gave it to herself and said YES, there was no holding her back.

In 2009 Lily received a Theatre Bay Area Titan Award, which led her to start the Bay Area Asian American Actors Collective, where she found kinship with fellow actor Leon Goertzen. A year later the two co-founded Ferocious Lotus, an Asian American theatre company in the San Francisco Bay Area. As it turns out, in one year, Lily birthed a theatre company and a baby! She remembers sitting in rehearsals for their first show—a night of one-acts co-sponsored by the Asian American Theatre Company—with her infant strapped in a baby carrier. I am particularly delighted by this image in my mind’s eye—a scrappy and determined young Lily with a script in one hand and a bottle in another, baby nuzzled up against her body—as it demonstrates the grit and passion that Lily has always brought to her work. With Lily at the helm as founding co-artistic director and later, artistic director, Ferocious Lotus went on to produce and support many emerging Asian American playwrights and artists and became a vibrant and influential theatre space with national recognition and reach.

In 2019, Lily moved on from Ferocious Lotus to become artistic director at Theater Mu, the premiere Asian American theatre of the Midwest based in Minneapolis. There Lily continued to grow the landscape of Asian American theatre and stretch the boundaries of definition and opportunity, always striving for diversity and equity in development, education, production, and outreach. Five years later in 2024, Lily found herself back in Southern California, the stomping ground of her youth, taking on the role of Artistic Director at East West Players (EWP).

EWP is the longest standing Asian American theatre and theatre of color in the nation, and Lily is ushering in its 60th anniversary. Honored by the task, she was particularly mindful of the curation of such a milestone season, aiming to create balance between the OGs of Asian American theatre–the elders like Philip Kan Gotanda and David Henry Hwang, who laid the foundation when there was no Asian American representation to speak—and the next generation of playwrights, like Lauren Yee, Prince Gomolvilas, and Jaclyn Backhaus, who have created works that have become Asian American classics in their own right.

In what she coins a “widening circles” vision for EWP, Lily focuses on several values that undergird her goals. Think of the concentric circles in the frequency of sound waves. In the first circle, Lily wants to encompass as much of the Asian American diaspora as possible. While Asian American representation in the theatre has historically limited itself to East Asian cultures, Lily recognizes the need for wider visibility for all Asians American voices including those from South, Southwest, and Southeast Asian American communities. Her second circle aims to acknowledge all the creativity and labor of the people backstage. What of the set and sound designers, costumers, and stagehands? Lily is doing just this by inaugurating a fellowship for backstage artists, where recipients will get paid on-the-job training to learn firsthand the behind-the-scenes work of production. The third circle aims to address intersectionality with other marginalized communities— LGBTQ, disability, or specific racialized communities to name a few examples. The fourth circle—and there’s some overlap here, but that’s the point—considers the question of how we make theater accessible to all people. EWP has made moves to make the theatre more affordable with $20 tickets or pay-what-you-can performances as well as affinity evenings for specific audiences. For example, for Cambodian Rock Band by Lauren Yee, EWP worked with Khmer leaders in Los Angeles to ensure that the show could be accessible to Khmer audiences; it stands to reason that a play about a people should be viewed and experienced by them, or else, whom and what is it really for? The final circle aims to innovate alongside and in collaboration with the film and television industry. A great example is in this season’s revival production of Philip Kan Gotanda’s Yankee Dawg You Die, which utilized high level film projections to capture the old-timey feel of Hollywood circa 1930s.

Notwithstanding all the managerial and administrative duties that come with leading a theatre of EWP’s size and stature, Lily has found space to nurture her own creative projects. This springtime, she will direct a revival of David Henry Hwang’s Flower Drum Song for this season’s last show. This is especially exciting for Lily who has known Hwang for years as a mentor and friend—and whose name is on the EWP theatre—but has never collaborated with him artistically. Hwang is also updating the musical after first rewriting it in 2002 to be more relevant to the times—Oh the times! Combine that with Lily’s musical theatre sensibility, and the show promises to be a tour de force.

The show runs from October 19 through November 16 at the Los Angeles Theatre Center.

Secondly, as I write this, Lily is completing her first tech week as director for नेहा & Neel (pronounced Neha and Neel) written by playwright Ankita Raturi and produced by Artists at Play. नेहा & Neel is about an Indian immigrant mother who goes on a road trip with her teenage son, in a last-ditch attempt to teach him his culture before he is off to college. Raturi’s play resists preachy polemics and instead engages with serious issues—racism, colonialism, identity in America—through humor. In another serendipitous collaboration, Lily found herself crossing paths again with Raturi, an artist she’d supported during her tenure at Theater Mu, but whose new work Fifty Boxes of Earth, which Lily programmed for Mu’s 2024-2025 season, she did not get to see to its fruition because of her departure last year. So, it was an honor to be asked by AAP and Raturi to direct this piece and to celebrate, as Lily describes, a play that centers on “Asian joy.”

Given the current political climate and the blatant assaults from this administration on people of color and the arts—EWP lost all its NEA funding—Lily does not take lightly the mandate of EWP.  She says, “It is more important than ever to continue to tell our stories and to lift up BIPOC stories. When people don’t know our stories, it’s so easy for them to perceive us as other.” She goes on to emphasize how important it is that “people see us for the true Americans that we are.” Everywhere we turn, this administration is pushing us to the margins, rendering us invisible as people of color, and telling us in so many words that “we are not patriotic or don’t belong here.” Lily is adamant that we counter the bigotry with our own narratives of community. She is committed to making EWP a “safe and joyful space to create art together” and it is with this spirit that Lily carries the torch for many generations of Asian American theatre artists—past, present, and future.

Finally, when I ask Lily, how she likes being back in Southern California outside of work, she quips, “the traffic sucks, the food’s great!” And to that I say, “Welcome home!”